Opiniones de Zephyr Enterprise
Calificación general
Filtrar
Tiempo usado
Opiniones de 16
- Sector: Automatización industrial
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Fantastic Test Management Add-In for JIRA
Revisado el 13/7/2022
This is one of the best tools that I have worked on to date for the tasks of test management. The...
This is one of the best tools that I have worked on to date for the tasks of test management. The tool directly helps me provide most the reports and artifacts that I need for my day-to-day work.
Puntos a favor
I love the ability to generate Reports and manage tests with ease. The rest APIs also allow to update of results of automation scripts to the JIRA and auto-generate dashboards, and status in JIRA.
The ability to add custom fields for test objects is a big customizability power.
Puntos en contra
The rest APIs can be made more simple to use.
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Zephyr really helped us work in a scaled agile way as well as integrating our automation...
Revisado el 2/7/2018
Where did we expect Zephyr to do well
- JIRA Integration Scaled Enterprise Agile
- Automation...
Where did we expect Zephyr to do well
- JIRA Integration Scaled Enterprise Agile
- Automation execution
- Global metrics
- Tablet and mobile test execution and real time metrics
What did leadership get
- On the go metrics at group level and product level
- Integration with Confluence for JIRA and Zephyr metrics
- Reduced cost as man hours are reduced, because all QA activities can be done via one tool
- 100% integration into all products
Puntos a favor
It allowed the entire project team to work together on all aspects of their testing within the context of their specific software releases, while keeping a global view.
Using structured and freeform test execution cycles, and the ability to run manual or kick-off automated tests in the automation tool of our choice allowed greater scalability.
All the results get updated in real time to dashboards for senior management to review. All testing assets, across all products, projects, releases and sprints all in one place. Standardize on tests, data, metrics, processes, executions, documents, reports etc. Able to re-purpose and reuse which saved time and increased productivity.
We required a test management application that would seamlessly integrate with our other business critical tools e.g. JIRA, Confluence, Eggplant, Ready API, Test Complete, Selenium, Jenkins etc
Puntos en contra
There were some bugs found after major releases, but these were always turned around and resolved very quickly after reporting them. If we found areas that required new feature requests or enhancements, these are generally delivered in a 4 or 8 week cycle
Respuesta de SmartBear
hello,
Thank you for your review of Zephyr. It seems you are quite satisfied with the tool.
We would like to connect with you to hear more about your usage of the tool and all of the great things your team is doing.
Please contact [email protected] so we can learn more.
Thanks again
- Sector: Hostelería
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado Mensualmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
Painful benefits
Revisado el 26/6/2024
If you must use a tool built into Jira that offers test cycles aligned with Jira versions and you...
If you must use a tool built into Jira that offers test cycles aligned with Jira versions and you can find a less painful way to create steps than to manually type them in, then it may work well for you.
Puntos a favor
With Zephyr I can create tests right inside Jenkins that leverage labels and components and release cycles.
Puntos en contra
I find creating steps to be an awful editing experience. I tend to write tests in the ticket description instead just so I can avoid the cumbersome work of filling out steps.
- Sector: Defensa y espacio
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 9.0 /10
Test Management System of Choice for our DevOps Journey!
Revisado el 14/6/2018
The benefits are truly amazing! We can now "see," in real-time, the progress of all our testing...
The benefits are truly amazing! We can now "see," in real-time, the progress of all our testing and release pipelines. The integrations to other software development applications is excellent, via the API's or plug-ins. We can now quantitatively make release decisions, and assure upper management that the product we are pushing to production has been thoroughly tested.
Puntos a favor
Robust two-way synchronization with Jira. Automatically sync's with sprint stories and bugs. Ease of use with solid API integrations and plug-ins with other major release pipeline applications. Customer support and interactions have been outstanding. Zephyr has a Customer Advisory Board, which meets twice a year, to listen to, and respond to the industry. The product and team have advanced rapidly, allowing our organization to accelerate our DevOps initiative. Zephyr continues to be on the foreground of innovation, as seen by their latest release named "Maestro," their DevOps plugin that takes Zephyr to the next level, as a qualitative test management solution. Very satisfied with all aspects of the product and its future road-map.
Puntos en contra
The only con to Zephyr, is its ability to manage role-based securities. However, through an engagement with our top executives, and the senior executive team from Zephyr, they now have this concern vetted and will be working to incorporate this capability into a future release. Zephyr actively listens to its customers, so any (and I mean any) concerns you have, they truly listen and actively work to satisfy the need.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 8.0 /10
A test management tool worth-considering!
Revisado el 19/10/2022
- As a software tester, a good test management tool is a must! And I believe that most, if not all,...
- As a software tester, a good test management tool is a must! And I believe that most, if not all, software testers out there will agree. To fit into this liking, Zephyr is really a worth-considering tool.- Zephyr consists all the basic and major functionalities that a test management tool should have. I love that this is integrated to Jira so its integration to Jira as a project management and bug tracking tool is a huge plus!- There may be some challenges when it comes to user experience but this is just a minor one
Puntos a favor
- Zephyr can be integrated to Jira so you can maximize the functionalities of Jira to Zephyr's core features- In Zephyr, you can create test cases, test plans, and test cycles very easily- Jira's different issue types like bugs and stories can easily be linked together with Zephyr- User friendly and components are easy to navigate- Can be integrated to other third-party apps for dashboard and reporting
Puntos en contra
- Even though the tool is user friendly and easy to navigate, the user experience is quite difficult and the flow of the process can become tedious especially if needs to be done multiple times- Creating of test cases is difficult when it comes to copying and pasting of multiple test steps
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 2-10 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 0.0 /10
Used to work with Jira.... now you constantly can't login!
Revisado el 16/5/2020
I have been a longtime Jira Capture user and at some point Zephyr replaced it. For a longtime it...
I have been a longtime Jira Capture user and at some point Zephyr replaced it. For a longtime it worked seamlessly... then all of a sudden we would get a constant "Invalid Login" when trying to login with Atlassian credentials. After contacting support several times I was told we had to create an API key. After going thru the pain... it would work for a week... then right when you urgently needed to take a screenshot it forgot the credentials and you are forced to create a new API key ... which takes over 15 minutes each time. Worked. Forgot credentials. Create key. Over and over. You have to pay for each user and after awhile it just got so frustrating it was no longer worth it. I wish Jira capture still was around. That worked flawlessly for years!
Puntos a favor
Integrated with Jira, allowed QA to easily capture screenshots
Puntos en contra
Cant login, login errors, can't use standard Atlassian credentials and forces you to create API keys, constantly forgets credentials but doesnt tell you until after you have filled out a full bug report so you end up losing all your work
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 201-500 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
consider Zephyr enterprise for easy test management
Revisado el 7/8/2022
it served as well when we were a small company (50-100) , it started to grow small on us when we...
it served as well when we were a small company (50-100) , it started to grow small on us when we got bigger and amount of executions got on a large scale with different configurations. overall it served its purpose and helped us managing our tests.
Puntos a favor
the easy integration with Jira, its mostly simple to configure.
Puntos en contra
missing better planning and the ability to dictate different configuration in which each test execution should be reported differently. its not fully customizable (the reporting mechanism as well)
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10
Nice product but the worst support
Revisado el 10/7/2017
Puntos a favor
easy to create a test plan and traceability between Stories and Task.
Easy to execute test cases and monitor daily test executions .
Also, you can assign test cases to testers and Tracks bugs vs Test iterations
Puntos en contra
it is supposed to be a Testing tool, but... every release ( 1 month approx) is a pain, Always you will find a problem and not able to use Zephyr for 3 / 4 days, Looks like a testing tool, does not have a tester to test it?
They do not have a Sanity Check to make sure to run a Smoke test and see how is Production. So disappoint it with the Roll out releases and support.
The functionality looks right but... they need to fight for the great quality.
- Sector: Investigación
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Prueba gratis
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
Nice case management tool
Revisado el 4/12/2018
Puntos a favor
The ease of use and the look of the overall system.
Puntos en contra
It is not super user friendly, but in its defense we only had it for a short time.
Respuesta de SmartBear
hello,
Thank you for your Review of Zephyr. Can you please let us know if you are referring to Zephyr for Jira or Zephyr Enterprise.
Our team would love to connect with you more and hear more about your usage.
Please reach out to [email protected] to learn more.
Thank you for your time
- Software usado A diario durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
It is not much easy to use
Revisado el 30/6/2018
Can maintain the test case with integrating with Jira
Can maintain the test case with integrating with Jira
Puntos a favor
Can create test cases directly and execute them separately. Able to link the defects which are in another tools.
Puntos en contra
Not able to create multiple test runs from the same test plan and execute parallel because it Overriding the final result automatically.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 1.001-5.000 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de dos años
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 5.0 /10
Good functionality, but the it's not so reliable.
Revisado el 9/7/2018
Puntos a favor
I worked mostly with Jira Plugin and it's pretty easy, obvious software, although Zephyr Teams & Enterprise more powerful.
Easy to monitor testing process, schedule testing and making adjustments.
Puntos en contra
Even it's a testing tool and team should know everything about quality - they push releases not fully checked, so we tired to have problems one-days a release.
Respuesta de SmartBear
Hello,
Thank you for your review. We would like to catch up to hear about some of the issues you were facing with the new releases.
Please connect with [email protected] to share some of your issues/concerns.
Thanks much
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 51-200 empleados
- Software usado A diario durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 1.0 /10
Slow, buggy when integrated with Jira
Revisado el 16/2/2021
Our organization needs to run test on weekly basis and we lost lot of time redacting them on the...
Our organization needs to run test on weekly basis and we lost lot of time redacting them on the interface that can reject the input for any hidden reason.
Navigating through collections of test was buggy and frustrating.
Puntos a favor
- few steps to create and execute tests
- few boilerplate jira objects (execution are on zephyr side, not on jira side)
- the "blocked" status
Puntos en contra
- Really slow to use, the integration with JIRA leads to data loss
- Hard to link snapshot, zip and other precondition or result artifacts and access it on execution
- Sector: Juegos de ordenador
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
Need More
Revisado el 27/10/2019
Puntos a favor
the features provided are great but not always usable
Puntos en contra
need more on the UX overall, it is NOT an easy app to use
- Sector: Software informático
- Tamaño de la empresa: 11-50 empleados
- Software usado Semanalmente durante Más de un año
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 10.0 /10
Zephyr for JIRA
Revisado el 17/8/2018
Puntos a favor
We use Zephyr inside JIRA to keep track of our manual testing. It works very well.
Puntos en contra
Sometimes there are small display issues.
Respuesta de SmartBear
hello,
Thank you for your review of Zephyr for Jira. Our team would love to catch up and hear more about your instance and usage of the tool.
Please reach out to [email protected] to catch up.
- Sector: Tecnología y servicios de la información
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado A diario durante 6-12 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Relación calidad-precio
- Facilidad de uso
- Asistencia al cliente
- Probabilidad de recomendación 6.0 /10
I am a Zephyr user
Revisado el 22/1/2019
Puntos a favor
1. Flexibility in updating information.
2. Cheapest add-in
3. Integration with JIRA defect management tool.
Puntos en contra
1. Integration with other application.
2. Cycle execution.
3. Not much flexible in agile process.
- Sector: Automoción
- Tamaño de la empresa: 10.000+ empleados
- Software usado Mensualmente durante 1-5 meses
-
Fuente de la reseña
Calificación general
- Facilidad de uso
- Probabilidad de recomendación 7.0 /10
Test Management & Execution Software
Revisado el 8/9/2018
Creation and execution of test cases/test steps.
Creation and execution of test cases/test steps.
Puntos a favor
It is integrated with JIRA which allows us to associate the test cases and execution with our sprints and user stories which are located in JIRA. It is very easy to associate a test cases to various sprints. The tool provides visualization of where the test case is in our process. The reporting of the test cases is great as well. It provides visualization of the # of passes and failures within a given sprint. It also provides the ability to import test cases/steps from an excel spreadsheet.
Puntos en contra
It seems like a lot of the information we have to enter for each step within a test case is very repetitive. I have not found a way yet where you can clone the information from a previous step so we do not have to enter the same information over and over again.
Respuesta de SmartBear
hello,
Thank you for your response and Review. We appreciate your feedback and love hearing from our customers, so we can gauge what our customers are thinking.
Please reach out to [email protected] to learn more about the tool and the cloning options we have availability.
Thanks much