Opiniones de QuarkXPress

Simplicidad, buen manejo tipográfico, excelente salida de PDF

pocos tutoriales de la empresa, poca información sobre las novedades y de ciertas funciones

Permite trabajar con mucha rapidez y de forma fácil

Le faltan algunas mejoras que tiene Adobe Indesign

No matter what the final project is, I'm able to create layouts fast and efficiently.

Subscription prices. I prefer the old single price which could be used for upgrades in the future.

It's a page layout powerhouse and does what it is intended to do. It's fairly user friendly and easy to learn the ins and outs.

Because Quark is a stand alone software, it loses any integration options with other programs that designers use on a daily basis. For this reason alone, it's difficult to rationalize using Quark instead of InDesign, which has so many crossovers with Illustrator, Photoshop and Acrobat.

Quark is relatively simple to learn and can be quick once you're used to it. It can be used to build and implement templates for multiple uses. Older versions can be a great value for the money.

Can crash and has features that appear outdated compared to similar Adobe products.

At first it took me a while to get used to the software, but after a while i got the hang of it. the workspace layout is great. It also has a lot of functions and tools to use.

I really have no cons as of yet. So far i love this software its my go to for all flyers, cards, brochures, and model comp cards.

The ease of use. I have tried In design, Canva, and Affinity publisher and none beats out the power and ease of Quark.

I feel like Quark has tried to make itself more like In Design. Quark 6.0 was the best version and beats out all the others hands down for ease of use and versatility. I feel the new versions are less Quark and more In Design.

My favourite thing about QuarkXPress is how easy it is to use. No cluttered side menus.
A well-structured programme that is fun to work with. You quickly find your way around the programme.

A good question that is difficult to answer because the programme is so good. Perhaps the programme could start faster. But this could also be due to my computer.

Simple to use. Commands easy to memorize.

Spell check/dictionary is not as effective as the one in Ready, Set, Go!

I learn something new everyday. The program has many options and can be a little intimidating but once you get the hang of it, it’s pretty easy to use!

I wish the viewing page on the print screen could be enlarged. My program also tends to crash on me and it’s annoying to have to restart it.

I've used Quark for decades and I'm familiar with it. It works well for page layout. Everyone uses InDesign now but I was a Quark diehard until now.

Quark 2018, which I bought on the App Store, crashed every 10-15 minutes. When I upgraded the OS, it wouldn't open. The Quark person explained that it's not compatible with Monterey. I literally had the software for three months but Quark would not give me a credit on an upgrade.

QuarkXPress is a great tool to have. Our company uses it for page design and it was easy to learn and master. We also recently used it for a book design.

It will sometimes lock up and close out on its own, losing any unsaved changes. It can be very frustrating. It happens on several computers, so we're not sure if it is our server or the program causing the issue.

I love everything about QuarkXPress. I've been using Quark since 1990 and also taught Quark for a few years. There is an elegance to the way Quark works that is missing in other page layout software. It was set up by graphic designers for graphic designers. Even though I own Adobe Creative Suite, I prefer to use Quark for print and web projects.

There is nothing that I dislike about Quark. Even if I run into a snag or problem I am able to find a solution easily with the Quark HELP feature or on their website.

Quark is a great way to put together newspaper pages. It's easy to design award-winning, sharp pages, and I have won multiple industry awards using Quark. There are so many useful functions that assist the page builder, and it's a fast program once all the nuances are learned.

Very few cons, maybe the most being that it tends to crash occasionally. But sometimes it crashes more on different computers, so it may not be a total problem with the program.

I don't really see any features that beat out InDesign. This used to be the industry standard, but less and less do my clients use Quark. Only in publishing and they are moving away from that.

It's not the standard and converting files to InDesign is not always seamless. Quark is outdated in my opinion.

It's intuitive and easy to use. Even a beginner should be able to easily design in this once you have been using it for an hour or two. Even better, you don't need a subscription for it! I have used Quark and Adobe InDesign and prefer Quark.

I don't have any complaints, I think it's a matter of what you were trained on: Quark vs InDesign.

I can output my jobs easily and effectively using the step and repeat and convert to pdf options. It's also fast.

I least like that it starts up slower than usual for older versions of the software. I also am not too cool with it not having the mail merge option

QuarkXPress is very easy to use if you have used Adobe InDesign or CorelDraw. The user interface has a good flow and everything can be spreadout with multiple monitors. Using it for publishing booklets was easy and the printer had no issues with the files.

Costs are a lttle steap for what I use it for. Would like more customization of the user interface. Overall no cons that would deter from considering for those that publish to the web or print on a regular basis.

Easy design software for someone who is not necessarily a graphic designer by trade. This software is easy to teach yourself to use.

Not as advanced as some of the other software programs out there. Some of the tools are harder to maneuver around.