Opiniones de Hired

Easy to use, lots of great little features like hiding pictures and names. It saves me a ton of time and everyone is working with the same mental model.

The search functionality could use improvement as well as the filtering in certain queries.

This software is great because you are reaching out to candidates that are already actively looking. It is more effective than any cold reach outs and I find that the quality of candidates is higher caliber as well.

It is not the easiest tool to navigate and often times, the search strings do not filter the candidates in the most precise way so it requires a lot of extra sorting through.

They have a lot of engaged candidates and most of them respond to you. Regardless of a positive or negative response, it's always nice to have people respond to your inquiries.

If you're looking for a full stack/backend/front end engineer then this place has a ton of them. If it's anything specific then a traditional team search would be more appropriate..

The quality of people us to be better. For some reason, the folks who I am talking to now feel like they haven't really been vetted by anybody. I've even seen some suspicious resume in the site.

Ease of use, Ability to set the requested base salary early on, Ability to manage most of your interviews in the same place

I wish they could integrate with a tool like Calendly

I like the transparency of the software - candidates can tell you exactly what they're looking for and pay is transparent up front.

As with any sourcing tool, some candidates do not understand the need to have more complete profiles. I've encountered a few (although this is not the majority) people who only list their job title and where they worked. Then there's no resume attached to the profile, and the LinkedIn profile they attach is not complete either. It makes it difficult to assess a candidate when there's no information on them.

If you are a decent engineer you can get lots of opportunities

If you are a recruiter it's mostly a waste of time and money

I like the branding. I think Hired has done a good job at branding their platform as sophisticated and on-boarding new users, especially those seeking a job. I thought the process of filling out your profile was really good and pretty easy to use. Overall, I think the look of the profile for a candidate feels a bit more refined than other platforms.

I thought the feedback system was a bit odd. I would get the email response before the actual content being live or available on the site. Meaning, if I get a response, it wasnt available on the site, but I did receive it via email. This generated a lot of confusion for me. I also felt that the actual display in which the recruiter or interviewer would chat with me was a bit odd. It felt like it was constrained within a screen with a lot of information.

I like how quickly you can import a resume, fill out some basic information about yourself, and get up and running. It makes it more likely for you to use, because you're probably juggling a lot of job sites and saving time is important.

I dislike the availability of jobs on the site - I'm a data scientist and found very limited company options in my area (Chicago).

I like that candidates are primed to interview and eager to find a new role. It's easy to use, adds candidates frequently, and is overall my favorite platform!

I like using it to find candidates. I could do without some of the back-end work (like marking when a candidate has interviewed) etc.

Resume search and filtering was really user friendly compare to other alternatives.

Multiple resume selection could be hard sometimes but other than that now issues.

Easy to see line up pf candidates and send them a message, also very easy to schedule interviews. I like that it syncs with my google calendar automatically.

Very hard to review a comprehensive account of people contacted, rejected, interviewed by myself. The list only goes down as far as last 10-15 people contacted.

Hired is seriously like trick or treating for recruiters. Full of well-qualified candidates who are all actively looking. I see faster response times through Hired than any other software. The interface is very clear to read and digest all information. Being able to search for specific skills is key in tech recruiting and Hired makes this very easy.

The amount of candidates I see for niche roles

I have used Hired as a software engineer when I am in the job search process. This is one of the only platforms where employers actually reach out to you asking for an interview without you having to apply. I have gotten tons of great interviews from this site.

I wish they allowed you to see what companies are hiring so you can reach out to them as well but nonetheless there is already plenty of inbound requests coming to you.

Ease of use; candidates are very often of really high quality and are 'vetted' thoroughly before they even sign up

Minor thing, but the calendar does not automatically sync with my timezone... or maybe it's my bad for not having looked at the option!

Candidate quality is amazing and the response rate is great as well.

There is a lot of competition so you need to move quickly.

Love it! easy to use and source applicants, high quality of applicants too. Very easy to schedule interviews

Kind of hard to reschedule interviews or to see history of who you have seen/interviewed. Basically history expires quickly and that's unfortunate.

I like that I can source candidates who are active in their job search that are similar in industry, and filter my searches. You can also get more insight into the candidate from your account manager which is helpful when competing against others. I also like that it integrates with Greenhouse which makes the export and source tracking easy. The fact that you can add people to your searches is great for collaboration.

I don't like that some markets aren't supported (for us it's Raleigh, North Carolina) and that some of the filtering seems limited when I am trying to get creative with my search strings. I wish we had more hires from the time spent sourcing.

Consistency, I know every week that there will be qualified candidates on Hired

The UI and search functionality can be improved

easy to use platform, i wish i could edit positions without saving the new information each time - i like to be able to have a free form search

representation of people, I'm willing to have wiggle room on reqs for people so that I can support a diverse team with underrepped groups

The tool is insanely easy to use and the candidates you talk to are "active" in their search.

some candidate quality is quite low. Also with so many similar tools out there, candidates are signing up for multiple platforms.

It is highly focused and from that perspective it improves the efficiency of a Hiring manager

It limits the ability to search the entire database. Most of my most valuable hires came almost completely from the left field - people who don't fit the job description like a glove because they have a multifaceted employment and education background

I found the salary and summary info were very easy to find and the platform as a whole was very intuitive where I did not need to watch videos to learn the platform.

For some of the more niche roles, it was difficult to find candidates since most of the pre built in config is meant for the more popular tech stacks [Java etc].

There are 2 things I liked about Hired the most. One, how easy it is to use. Two, the customer service. Ali (and Rigis) are super helpful on tracking our hires and movement.

There are few things I do not like.
1. The quality of engineers has gone down since hired has grown.
2. It took a while to get the feature of having the same question with different locations on your platform. Thank you for doing that!.
3. As a personal thing, Hired turned off our service because we were late signing our new contract. I thought this was not great business since we've been working with you all from the beginning and have made a lot of hires from your platform.

It’s easy to use and integrates with Greenhouse better than some of their competitors.

The cost per hire is a bit high. If they offered a bundles that would be easier